Modeling of radon flux density depending on air temperature and humidity (using the example of the anomalous zone of Mount Beshtau)

  • P.A. Sidyakin Pyatigorsk Institute (branch) of the North Caucasus Federal University, 46 Ermolova Str., Pyatigorsk 357500, Russian Federation
  • A.A. Baryshnikov Pyatigorsk Institute (branch) of the North Caucasus Federal University, 46 Ermolova Str., Pyatigorsk 357500, Russian Federation
  • I.M. Pershin Pyatigorsk Institute (branch) of the North Caucasus Federal University, 46 Ermolova Str., Pyatigorsk 357500, Russian Federation
  • P.S. Miklyaev Sergeev Institute of Environmental Geoscience, Russian Academy of Sciences, 13/2 Ulanskiy lane, Moscow 101000
Keywords: radon, Mount Beshtau, radon flux density, radon anomaly, regression analysis, modeling

Abstract

Relevance. Studying radon transport mechanisms and identifying anomalies, such as on Mount Beshtau (Caucasian Mineral Waters region), where extremely high radon flux density (RFD) values have been recorded, is critically important for assessing radiation risk. The primary source of radon in buildings is its entry from soil, particularly in fault zones where convective transport is most prevalent. The aim of the study is to develop a mathematical model for predicting radon flux density based on meteorological and other parameters that potentially influence radon emission from rocks into the atmosphere. The study aims to analyze the influence of air temperature and humidity on the flux density within the identified radon anomaly on the western slope of Mount Beshtau. Methods. Data from radon activity, temperature, and humidity measurements taken between 2018 and 2020 were used for the analysis. A prototype mathematical model for predicting radon activity was developed using multiple linear regression. Results. A prototype mathematical model was developed that can predict radon activity based on temperature and humidity with a reliability of approximately 71 %. Validation of the model using independent data showed close agreement between the forecast and actual measured values. It was determined that improving prediction accuracy requires incorporating additional factors such as atmospheric pressure, soil moisture, soil temperature, and seismic activity. Work has begun on integrating these parameters into the model. The model has also been implemented as software.

References

Бобров А.А. К вопросу о сейсмической активности и поле радона в Приольхонье (Западное Прибайкалье). // Известия Сибирского отделения Секции наук о Земле Российской академии естественных наук. Геология, поиски и разведка рудных месторождений. – 2016. – № 3(56). – С. 76–85. DOI: 10.21285/0130-108Х-2016-56-3-76-85.

Бондарь И.В., Гордеев Н.А. Новейшее напряженно-деформированное состояние южного борта Кандалакшского грабена. // Известия Российской академии наук. Серия географическая. – 2022. – Т. 86. № 6. – С. 870–882. DOI: 10.31857/S2587556622060036.

Гулабянц Л.А. Новый подход к решению проблемы защиты зданий от радона. // Вестник МГСУ. – 2011. – № 3-2. – С. 3–8.

Заалишвили В.Б., Бирюлин С.В., Козлова И.А., Мельков Д.А., Юрков А.К. Закономерности проявления аномалий объёмной активности радона перед землетрясениями в различных сейсмоактивных регионах. // Геология и геофизика Юга России. – 2022. – Т. 12. № 1. – С. 35–50. DOI: 10.46698/VNC.2022.53.28.003.

Карпенко Е.И., Санжарова Н.И., Спиридонов С.И., Серебряков И.С. Радиоэкологическая обстановка в районе размещения бывшего уранодобывающего предприятия ЛПО «Ал- маз». // Радиация и риск. – 2009. – Т. 18. № 4. – С. 73–81.

Маренный А.М., Цапалов А.А., Микляев П.С., Петрова Т.Б. Закономерности формирования радонового поля в геологической среде. М.: «Перо», 2016. – 394 с.

Машковцев Г.А., Константинов А.К., Мигута А.К., Шумилин Н.В., Щеточкин В.Н. Уран Российских недр. М.: ВИМС, 2010. – 850 с.

Панов А.В. Радиоэкологические проблемы в районе размещения Лермонтовского предприятия «Алмаз» по добыче и переработке урановой руды. Обзор. // Радиация и риск. – 2023. – Т. 32. № 1. – С. 131–153. DOI: 10.21870/0131-3878-2023-32-1-131-153.

Титов А.В., Шандала Н.К., Исаев Д.В., Семенова М.П., Серегин В.А., Бельских Ю.С., Остапчук Т.В., Чернобаев А.С. Оценка радиационной опасности пребывания населения и ведения хозяйственной деятельности в районе расположения выработанного уранового месторождения. // Медицинская радиология и радиационная безопасность. – 2020. – Т. 65. № 2. – С. 11–16.

Belsley D.A., Kuh E., Welsch R.E. Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2005. – 320 p.

Bena E., Ciotoli G., Petermann E., Bossew P., Ruggiero L., Verdi L., Huber P., Mori F., Mazzoli C., Sassi R. A new perspective in radon risk assessment: Mapping the geological hazard as a first step to define the collective radon risk exposure. // Science of The Total Environment. – 2024. – Vol. 912. – Art. No. 169569. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169569.

Di Carlo C., Ampollini M., Antignani S., Caprio M., Carpentieri C., Caccia B., Bochicchio F. Extreme reverse seasonal variations of indoor radon concentration and possible implications on some measurement protocols and remedial strategies. // Environmental Pollution. – 2023. – Vol. 327. – Art. No. 121480. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121480.

Miklyaev P.S., Petrova T.B., Shchitov D.V., Sidyakin P.A., Murzabekov M.A., Tsebro D.N., Marennyy A.M., Nefedov N.A., Gavriliev S.G. Radon transport in permeable geological environments. // Science of the Total Environment. – 2022. – Vol. 852. – Art. No. 158382. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158382.

Moreno V., Bach J., Font L., Baixeras C., Zarroca M., Linares R., Roque C. Soil radon dynamics in the Amer fault zone: an example of very high seasonal variations. // Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. – 2016. – Vol. 151. Pt. 1. – pp. 293–303. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.10.018.

Neda T., Dosa A. Seasonal variations of radon activity concentration in mofettes from Harghita and Covasna Counties, Romania. // Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. – 2024. – Vol. 273. – Art. No. 107389. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2024.107389.

Perrier F., Bourges F., Girault F., Lartiges B., Bonnet S., Genty D., Denele Y., Regard V., Regnier E., Bouquerel H., Lei Bo, Rivet Th., Losno R. Radon-222 signatures of atmospheric dynamics in the Pech Merle Painted Cave, France: Consequences for management and conservation. // Science of The Total Environment. – 2024. – Vol. 949. – Art. No. 174648. DOI: 10.1016/j. scitotenv.2024.174648.

Petermann E., Bossew P., Kemski J., Gruber V., Suhr N., Hoffmann B. Development of a high-resolution indoor radon map using a new machine learning- based probabilistic model and German radon survey data. // Environmental Health Perspectives. – 2024. – Vol. 132. Issue 9. – Art. No. 97009. DOI: 10.1289/EHP14171.

Pulliam H.R., Embury C.M., Rempe M.P., Okelberry H.J., Rice D.L., Coutant A.T., Glesinger R., Wilson T.W., Taylor B.K. Chronic radon exposure is associated with developmental alterations to neural and behavioral indices of cognitive control. // NeuroImage. – 2025. – Vol. 321. – Art. No. 121524. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121524.

Schmidt P. Proof of the radiological remediation success at former uranium mining and milling sites (WISMUT sites) in Germany. In: 4th Europ. IRPA Congr. Geneve, Switzerland. June 23–27, 2014.

Seber G.A.F. Linear regression analysis. New York: Wiley and Sons, 1977. – 465 p.

Sundal A.V., Valen V., Soldal O., Strand T. The influence of meteorological parameters on soil radon levels in permeable glacial sediments. // Science of The Total Environment. – 2008. – Vol. 389. Issues 2–3. – pp. 418–428. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.09.001.

Tallini M., Guerriero V., Nyberg A.A., Wyss R. et al. Selection of hydrosensitive to seismicity sites for radon monitoring in the Abruzzo aquifers (central Italy) within the European ArtEmis project. // Physics and Chemistry of the Earth Parts A/B/C. – 2025. – Vol. 141. Pt. 2. – Art. No. 104127. DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2025.104127.

Published
2026-03-30