Stability of fluid permeability of volcanogenic reservoirs under deformation

  • A.B. Hasanov Azerbaijan State Oil and Industry University, 20 Azadlig Ave., Baku AZ1010, Azerbaijan; Oil and Gas Institute, Ministry of Science and Education of the Republic of Azerbaijan, 9 F. Amirov Str., Baku AZ1000, Azerbaijan
  • E.Yu. Abbasov Research Institute of Geotechnological Problems of Oil, Gas and Chemistry, 8 November Str., Baku AZ1010, Azerbaijan
  • D.N. Mamedova Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Ministry of Science and Education of the Republic of Azerbaijan, G. Javid Ave., 119, Baku AZ1143, Azerbaijan
Keywords: hard-to-recover reserves, volcanogenic-sedimentary reservoirs, deformation, filtration-capacitive properties

Abstract

The implemented research is relevant because in some cases the developing peculiarity of hard-to-recover reserves (HTR) fields is associated with the fact that the hydrocarbon content here is confined to unconventional – carbonate reservoirs and volcanic sediments. This group of reservoirs differs from traditional, terrigenous (sandy) reservoirs by a significant content of volcanic material, which changes the filtration-capacity properties of oil-containing reservoirs. The main objective of this study is summarizing the data on the mechanical properties of volcanic rocks, potential oil and gas reservoirs, with the identification of the stability conditions of the porosity and permeability properties of hydrocarbon-containing volcanic reservoirs during development of deposit. Methods. Most of the factual material on the deformation of carbonate reservoirs and volcanic obtained on a unique experimental device at the University of Strasbourg (France, Institute Terre & Environment de Strasbourg (ITES)). In this device, all-round hydrostatic pressure provided with simultaneous axial deformation. The maximum all-round and pore pressure is 200 MPa, and the axial load is 400 MPa. Results. Due to the generalization and existing data comparison follows that in terms of compressive strength (Ucs) all the studied tuffs are characterized by values of 29.6 MPa on average, which, according to the Deere and Miller classification, corresponds to “weakly strongˮ environments (Ucs≥55.0–27.5 MPa). However between the selected groups ignimbrite tuffs, with average values of Ucs=11.18 MPa belong to “very weakly strongˮ matter (according to the Deere and Miller classification). The average values of flexural strength (Fts) in the tested tuffs are 3.87 MPa, although in the group of ignimbrite tuffs this figure is lower and equals 2.19 MPa. In terms of impact toughness (Dn), point load index (Is) and hardness (HB), the group of ignimbrite tuffs also has the lowest values – 3.15 MPa, 1.80 MPa and 4.58 kg/mm2, with average values for all tuffs being 7.36 MPa, 2.42 MPa and 16.44 kg/mm2, respectively.However, the group of ignimbrite tuffs demonstrated quite high rates of resistance to abrasive wear (Bsa=117.15 cm3/50 cm2), with an average for all tuffs equal to 72.57 cm3/50 cm2.

References

Вольфман Ю.М. Динамика изменений напряженно-деформированного состояния земной коры Черноморской впадины в моделях сейсмогенеза. // Геология и геофизика Юга России. – 2023. – Т. 13. № 2. – С. 40–54. DOI: 10.46698/VNC.2023.83.75.004.

Даидбекова Э.А., Сафаров Г.И. Особенности формирования залежей нефти в эффузивных породах месторождения Мурадханлы. // Геология нефти и газа. – 1979. – № 9. – С. 56–57.

Попков В.И., Попков И.В. О сохранении поровых коллекторов в нижней части разреза нефтегазоносных отложений триаса Скифско-Туранской платформы. // Геология и геофизика Юга России. – 2023. – Т. 13. № 2. – С. 106 – 117. DOI: 10.46698/VNC.2023.10.85.009

Справочник по нефтяным и газовым месторождениям зарубежных стран. Кн.1, 2. / Редактор И.В. Высоцкий. – М.: Недра, 1976. – 600 с.

Тасман С.Е. Связь нефтегазопроявлений с изверженными породами в Турции. В кн.: XX Международный геол. конгресс. Материалы по геологии нефти. Страны Европы и Турция. – М.: Гостоптехиздат, 1959. – С. 24–25.

Теймен А. Прогнозирование основных механических параметров туфов по результатам испытаний. // Физико-технические проблемы разработки полезных ископаемых. – 2018. – № 5. – С. 18–32. DOI: 10.15372/FTPRPI20180503.

Черненко К.И., Саидова К.М., Еремина Н.В., Шатохин Н.Е. Выделение зон повышенной трещиноватости нефтекумского природного резервуара Восточно-Безводненского месторождения с использованием программного продукта «тНавигатор». // Геология и геофизика Юга России. – 2025. – Т. 15. № 2. – С. 206–218. DOI: 10.46698/VNC.2025.97.91.001.

Эзирбаев Т.Б., Гацаева С.С-А., Абдулшахидова Х.А. Анализ зависимости пористости нижнемеловых коллекторов Терско-Сунженской нефтегазоносной области от петрофизических параметров. // Геология и геофизика Юга России. – 2024. – Т. 14. № 2. – С. 194–206. DOI:10.46698/VNC.2024.29.28.015.

Acosta M., Violay M. Mechanical and hydraulic transport properties of transverse isotropic Gneiss deformed under deep reservoir stress and pressure conditions. // International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. – 2020. – Vol. 130. Art. No. 104235.

Al-Rbeawi S., Jalal F. Fluid flux throughout matrix-fracture interface: Discretizing hydraulic fractures for coupling matrix Darcy flow and fractures non-Darcy flow. // Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. – 2019. – Vol. 73. Art. No. 103061. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2019.103061.

Ball J.L., Taron J., Reid M.E., Hurwitz S., Finn C., Bedrosian P. Combining multiphase groundwater flow and slope stability models to assess stratovolcano flank collapse in the Cascade Range. // Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. – 2018. – Vol. 123. Issue 4. – pp. 2787–2805. DOI: 10.1002/2017jb015156.

Bourbie T., Zinszner B. Hydraulic and acoustic properties as a function of porosity in Fontainebleau sandstone. // Journal of Geophysical Research. – 1985. – Vol. 90(B13). pp. 11524– 11532. DOI: 10.1029/jb090ib13p11524.

Carlino S., Piochi M., Tramelli A., Mormone A., Montanaro C., Scheu B., Klaus M. Fieldscale permeability and temperature of volcanic crust from borehole data: CampiFlegrei, southern Italy. // Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. – 2018. – Vol. 357. – pp. 276–286. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.05.003.

Day S.J. Hydrothermal pore fluid pressure and the stability of porous, permeable volcanoes. // Geological Society, London, Special Publications. – 1996. – Vol. 110(1). – pp. 77–93. DOI: 10.1144/gsl.sp.1996.110.01.06.

Deere D.U., Miller R.P. Engineering classification and index properties for intact rock. Illinois: Univ at Urbana Dept of Civil Engineering, 1966. – 327 p.

Ehrenberg S.N. The etiology of carbonate porosity AAPG. // American Association of Petroleum Geologists. – 2022. – Vol. 106. No. 12. – pp. 2351–2386. DOI: 10.1306/08082221065.

Ehrenberg S.N., Nadeau P.H. Sandstone vs. carbonate petroleum reservoirs: A global perspective on porosity-depth and porositypermeability relationships. // AAPG Bulletin. – 2005. – Vol. 89. Issue 4. – pp. 435–445DOI: 10.1306/11230404071.

Farquharson J.I., Heap M.J., Baud P. Strain-induced permeability increase in volcanic rock. // Geophysical Research Letters. – 2016. – Vol. 43(22). – pp. 11–603. DOI: 10.1002/2016gl071540.

Hasanov A.B., Isfandiyarov O.A., Mehraliyeva N.H., Abbasov T.S. Stability conditions of oil-saturated reservoirs porosity with deep overlaying. // ANAS Transactions, Earth Sciences. – 2022. – Vol. 2. – pp. 46–53. DOI: 10.33677/ggianas20220200081.

Heap M.J., Bayramov K., Meyer G.G., Violay M.E.S. et al. Compaction and permeability evolution of tuffs from Krafla volcano (Iceland). // Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. – 2024. – Vol. 129. Issue 8. Art. No. e2024JB029067. DOI: 10.1029/2024JB029067.

Heap M.J., Meyer G.G., Noel C., Wadsworth F.B., Baud P., Violay M.E. The permeability of porous volcanic rock through the brittle-ductile transition. // Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. – 2022. – Vol. 127. Issue 6. Art. No. e2022JB024600. DOI: 10.1029/2022jb024600.

Hurwitz S., Kipp K.L., Ingebritsen S.E., Reid M.E. Groundwater flow, heat transport, and water table position within volcanic edifices: Implications for volcanic processes in the Cascade Range. // Journal of Geophysical Research. – 2003. – Vol. 108(B12). Issue 2557. DOI: 10.1029/2003jb002565.

Meng F., Baud P., Ge H., Wong T.-F. The effect of stress on limestone permeability and effective stress behavior of damaged samples. // Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. – 2019. – Vol. 124. Issue 1. – pp. 376–399. DOI: 10.1029/2018jb016526.

Qalkin S.V., Savitskiy Y.V., Osovetski B.M., Kazimov K.P., Qurbanov V.S., Hasanov A.B., Abbasova Q.Q., Kazimov R.R. Detailed study of hydraulic fracturing of Kashiro-Vereyrocks by electron microscopy. // ANAS Transactions, Earth Sciences. – 2022. – Vol. 1. – pp. 17–27. DOI: 10.33677/ggianas20220100069.

Reid M.E. Massive collapse of volcano edifices triggered by hydrothermal pressurization. // Geology. – 2004. – Vol. 32. Issue 5. – pp. 373–376. DOI: 10.1130/g20300.1.

Sliaupa S.A.U.L.I.U.S., Lozovskis S., Lazauskiene J., Sliaupiene R. Petrophysical and mechanical properties of the lower Silurian perspective oil/gas shales of Lithuania. // Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. – 2020. – Vol. 79. Art. No. 103336.

Published
2025-09-30