Release of seismotectonic stresses of the Eastern Turkey earthquake on 06 February 2023 MW = 7.8 as a destruction process in focal area

  • E.G. Geodakyan Institute of Geophysics and Engineering Seismology after A. Nazarov of NAS RA, 5 V. Sargsyan Str., Gyumri 3115, Republic of Armenia; International Scientific and Educational Center of NAS RA, 24 Marshal Baghramyan Str., Yerevan 0019, Republic of Armenia
  • J.K. Karapetyan Institute of Geophysics and Engineering Seismology after A. Nazarov of NAS RA, 5 V. Sargsyan Str., Gyumri 3115, Republic of Armenia; International Scientific and Educational Center of NAS RA, 24 Marshal Baghramyan Str., Yerevan 0019, Republic of Armenia
  • V.B. Zaalishvili Geophysical Institute, Vladikavkaz Scientific Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 93a Markova Str., Vladikavkaz 362002, Russian Federation
  • M.A. Mkrtchyan Institute of Geophysics and Engineering Seismology after A. Nazarov of NAS RA, 5 V. Sargsyan Str., Gyumri 3115, Republic of Armenia
  • B.V. Sahakyan Institute of Geophysics and Engineering Seismology after A. Nazarov of NAS RA, 5 V. Sargsyan Str., Gyumri 3115, Republic of Armenia
  • S.M. Hovhannisyan Institute of Geophysics and Engineering Seismology after A. Nazarov of NAS RA, 5 V. Sargsyan Str., Gyumri 3115, Republic of Armenia; International Scientific and Educational Center of NAS RA, 24 Marshal Baghramyan Str., Yerevan 0019, Republic of Armenia
  • R.K. Karapetyan Institute of Geophysics and Engineering Seismology after A. Nazarov of NAS RA, 5 V. Sargsyan Str., Gyumri 3115, Republic of Armenia
  • G.A. Mkrtchyan Institute of Geophysics and Engineering Seismology after A. Nazarov of NAS RA, 5 V. Sargsyan Str., Gyumri 3115, Republic of Armenia
Keywords: earthquake source, aftershock, rupture formation, cluster, destruction

Abstract

Relevance. The destructive earthquakes that took place in the southeastern part of the large East Anatolian transform fault (EAF) in February 2023, with magnitudes Mw = 7.8, 7.5 and 6.3, respectively, are the major seismic events that have occurred over the last century in the junction area of the Eurasian, African and Arabian lithospheric macroplates. It should be outlined that such destructive and large earthquakes are extremely rare in seismically active regions. A detailed study of earthquake focal zones as well as the processes of rupture formation and relaxation of tectonic stresses in the form of aftershocks of such earthquakes are relevant scientific problems that make it possible for making a significant contribution to the seismogenesis concept of a particular region and finding solutions to fundamental problems in the study of the physics of the earthquake source in general. Aim. The paper aims to assess the stress-strain state, identify the main patterns and characteristic features of the destruction process for the geoenvironment in the focal area of the largest Gaziantep earthquake with a magnitude of MW=7.8 based on the spatial-temporal and energy distribution of the aftershock process. Methods. In order to study the destruction process, we have currently formed scientific and methodological ideas about extended deep faults as volumetric geological bodies with three-dimensional measurements (fault length, width and depth of penetration into the lithosphere), characterized by a certain internal structure, parameters and kinematics of wing movement. To carry out the spatial distribution of aftershocks, topological methods of percolation and cluster analysis of seismic statistical data of aftershocks were applied. Results. Based on the obtained results it was possible to determine the quantitative, spatiotemporal parameters of the complex tectonophysical model and to identify the nature of the destruction of the geological environment and the overall picture of the seismogenesis in the focal zone of the earthquake. The areas of short-term geodynamic activation that periodically occur on extended regional faults can be considered as hypocenters for the preparation and occurrence of large earthquakes. This approach makes a significant input to solving problems of long-term earthquake forecasting, and considering regional seismicity from the perspective of modern geodynamics.

References

Геодакян Э.Г., Карапетян Дж.К., Заалишвили В.Б., Саакян Б.В., Оганесян С.М., Мкртчян М.А., Мкртчян Г.А. Региональная сейсмотектоника очаговых зон восточно-турецких землетрясений 06 февраля 2023 г. и геодинамическая модель очага сильнейшего землетрясения (Mw=7,8). // Геология и геофизика Юга России. – 2023. – Т. 13. No 4. – C.42–54.

Гольдин С.В. Деструкция литосферы и физическая мезомеханика. // Физическая мезомеханика. – 2002. – Т. 5. No 5. – С. 5–22.

Дещеревский А.В., Мирзоев К.М., Лукк А.А. Критерии группирования землетрясений с учетом пространственной неоднородности сейсмичности. // Физика Земли. – 2016. – No 1 – C. 79–97. DOI: 10.7868/S0002333715060022.

Кондорская Н.В., Шебалин Н.В. Новый каталог сильных землетрясений на территории СССР с древнейших времен до 1975 г. М.: Наука, 1977. – 536 с.

Кочарян Г.Г. Разломная зона как нелинейная механическая система. // Физическая мезомеханика. – 2010. – Т. 13 (Спец. Выпуск). – С. 5–17.

Кочарян Г.Г., Кишкина С.Б. Физическая мезомеханика очага землетрясения. // Физическая мезомеханика. – 2020. – Т. 23. No 6. – С. 9–24. DOI: 10.24411/1683-805X-2020-16001.

Кочарян Г.Г., Спивак А.А. Динамика деформирования блочных массивов горных пород. М.: ИКЦ Академкнига, 2003. – 423 с.

Макаров П.В. Подход физической мезомеханики к моделированию процессов деформации и разрушения. // Физическая мезомеханика. – 1998. – Т. 1. No 1. – С.61–81.

Макаров П.В. Моделирование процессов деформации и разрушения на мезоуровне. // Известия академии наук. Механика твердого тела. – 1999. – No 5. – С. 109–131.

Макаров П.В. Об иерархической природе деформации и разрушения твердых тел и сред. // Физическая мезомеханика. – 2004. – Т. 7. No 4. – С. 25–34.

Панин В.Е. Основы физической мезомеханики. // Физическая мезомеханика. – 1998. – Т.1. No 1. – С. 5–22.

Пиотровский В.В. Использование морфометрии для изучения рельефа и строения Земли. // Земля во Вселенной. – 1964. – С. 278–297.

Садовский М.А. Естественная кусковатость горной породы. // Доклады академии наук СССР. – 1979. – Т. 247. No 4. – С. 829–831.

Шерман С.И. Стационарная и нестационарная модели формирования крупных разломов литосферы и их использование для пространственно-временного анализа сейсмического процесса. // Эволюция тектонических процессов в истории Земли. Новосибирск: Изд. СО РАН. – 2004. – Т. 2. – С. 299–302.

Шерман С.И. Деструкция литосферы: Разломно блоковая делимость и ее тектонофизические закономерности. // Геодинамика и тектонофизика. – 2012. – Т. 3. No 4. – С. 315–344.

Abrehdari S.H., Karapetyan J.K., Rahimi H., Geodakyan E. Tectonic Activities Description in the Ongoing Collision Zone of the Eurasia-Arabia Plates Using 2D SurfaceWaves Tomography. // Russian Journal of Earth Sciences. – 2023. – Vol. 23. No. 2. ES2004. DOI: 10.2205/2023ES000835.

Baltzopoulos G., Baraschino R., Chioccarelli E., Cito P. Near-source ground motion in the M7.8 Gaziantep (Turkey) earthquake. // Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. – 2023. – Vol. 52. No. 11. – pp. 3903–3912. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3939.

Bath M. Lateral inhomogeneities of the upper mantle. // Tectonophysics. – 1965. – Vol. 2. Issue 6. – pp. 483–514.

Berberian M. Natural hazards and the first earthquake catalogue of Iran. // Historical Hazards in Iran Prior to 1900. – 1994. – Vol. 1. – 603 p.

Ergin K., Guglu U., Uz Z. A catalogue of earthquakes of Turkey and surrounding area (11 A.D. to 1964 A.D.). // Technical Report, İstanbul Technical University, Faculty of Mines, Institute of Physics of the Earth. – 1967. – Vol. 24. – 169 p.

Ismail-Zadeh A., Adamia S., Chabukiani A., Chelidze T., Cloetingh S., Floyd M., Gorshkov A., Gvishiani A., Ismail-Zadeh T., et al. Geodynamics, seismicity, and seismic hazards of the Caucasus. // Earth-Science Reviews. – 2020. – Vol. 207. Art. No. 103222. DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103222.

Karapetyan J., Geodakyan E., Karapetyan R., Hovhannisyan L., Matevosyan G. Study of modern regional and local anomal variations of seismicity in the Tavro-Caucasian region. // EGU General Assembly. – 2023. – EGU23-16905. DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-egu23-16905.

Kocharyan G.G., Kishkina S.B., Ostapchuk A.A. Seismic picture of a fault zone. What can be gained from the analysis of fine patterns of spatial distribution of weak earthquake centers? // Geodynamics and Tectonophysics. – 2010. – Vol. 1. No. 4. – pp. 419–440. DOI: 10.5800/GT-2010-1-4-0027.

Kocharyan G.G., Kishkina S.B., Ostapchuk A.A. Seismogenic width of fault zone. // Doklady Earth Sciences. – 2011. – Vol. 437. No. 1. – pp. 412–415. DOI: 10.1134/S1028334X11030147.

Kocharyan G.G., Ostapchuk A.A.Mesostructure of a Tectonic Fault Slip Zone. // Physical Mesomechanics. – 2023. – Vol. 26. No. 1. – pp. 82–92. DOI: 10.1134/S1029959923010095.

Leonov M.G., Kocharyan G.G., Revuzhenko A.F., Lavrikov S.V. Tectonics of rock loosening: geological data and physics of the process. // Geodynamics & Tectonophysics. – 2020. –Vol. 11. No. 3. – pp. 491–521. DOI: 10.5800/GT-2020-11-3-0488.

Mai P.M., Aspiotis T., Aquib T.A., Cano E.V. et al. The Destructive Earthquake Doublet of 6 February 2023 in South-Central Türkiye and Northwestern Syria: Initial Observations and Analyses. // The Seismic Record. – 2023. – Vol. 3. No. 2. – pp. 105–115. DOI: 10.1785/0320230007.

Makarov P.V. Resonance structure and inelastic strain and defect localization in loaded media. // Physical Mesomechanics. – 2011. – Vol. 14. Issue 5-6. – pp. 297–307. DOI: 10.1016 /j.physme.2011.12.008.

Spivak A.A. Rigidity of the fault zones in the Earthis crust estimated from seismic data. // Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth. – 2011. – Vol. 47. No. 7. – pp. 600–609. DOI: 10.1134 /S1069351311060061.

Spivak A.A., Tsvetkov V.M. A new model of the zonal structure of fractures. // Doklady Earth Sciences. – 2009. – Vol. 424. Issue 1. – pp. 151–154. DOI: 10.1134/S1028334X09010322.

Published
2024-09-30

Most read articles by the same author(s)